Skip to main content

College is a waste of time

In Dale Stephens' essay "College Is A Waste of Time", he brings about an important argument: Is going to college worth it? There are those who think that college is a waste of time and the others who believe that college is mandatory for a good future. However, in order to properly voice out those opinions, there is a certain structure to follow in order to ensure an effective argument.

This particular structure is referred to as the Four Pillars of Argument. The first pillar would be a thesis which includes the main point that you're trying to prove. Next would be the evidence. The evidence is what makes your thesis statement stronger and would help your audience see your side clearer. Third would be a refutation. A refutation addresses the other side of the argument in order to discredit the other side making your side stronger. Lastly, to close up the argument you use a concluding statement in order to tie in your point and refocus your argument.

We can use Stephen's essay as an example of using the four pillars. The first pillar can be located in paragraph 2. The thesis of the essay is located in the last sentence when he says, "Our creativity, innovation, and creativity is schooled out of us."

The second pillar can be located in paragraphs 3, 4, 6, and 8. In paragraph 3 he mentions that what college fails at is empowering their students to have the gain the skills necessary to become productive members of the economy.  In the fourth paragraph, he mentions a statistic about the inflation of the price of college. Stephen also mentions in the book, Academically Adrift, more than a quarter of students who went through two to four years of college hadn't shown improvement in critical thinking or complex reasoning. In paragraph 6, he mentions those who became successful without the help of a college degree. Lastly, in paragraph 8, Stephen mentions that people get degrees in order to communicate to employers that they are capable for the job. However, he also states that the internet is taking over that role. Instead of looking for degrees, employers are looking for experience and portfolios that can easily be reached online. All of these ideas and statements are forms of evidence which helps Stephens' thesis more feasible. The refutation can be found in paragraph 9. Stephen mentions that there are some degrees that do require formal education. Especially if you are becoming a doctor, you can't have access to cadavers in your home, therefore, you need the resources of a college. The concluding statement can be found in the last paragraph. He states, "We who take our education outside and beyond the classroom understand how actions build a better world."

Stephens appeals to his audience by using a combination of ethos, logos, and pathos. He uses ethos when he mentions statistics, books, and other outside resources. The use of this rhetoric causes the reader to trust this information being given since it seems like the information is coming from a reliable source. His use of pathos is shown in the beginning of the essay when he introduces the topic. He uses passionate language when he says that the college education system is broken. This would cause the audience to feel what he is feeling. Lastly, he uses logos when he explains in the second paragraph what college is actually doing to our youth. By saying that college schools us out of being creative and innovative. This makes the audience call on their experiences to make sense of if school helped or took away their creativity and critical thinking.


Comments

  1. I agree with you. We had the same thesis statement and also we had the same idea that the author was trying to point out to do something else rather than going to college because you'll just end up wasting time while you could be learning a career without it.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Blog post 6

The topic that I chose to argue about is the relationship between diet and it's effect on our environment. My research question was how does an omnivorous diet affect the environment? The conclusion that I have come to is that the omnivorous diet has negative effects on the environment. Because of the increased demand for animal products, factory farming has become more prominent. With the use of family farming increasing, greenhouse gases and other harmful factors now affect the environment. I chose this topic specifically because I am vegan myself. This means that I don't consume any animal products. I don't eat meat or anything that came from an animal. This includes eggs, milk, and honey. There are people who think that veganism is only about animal rights, however, despite what your opinions may be on animal rights the effect that eating meat has on the environment is not sustainable. If you're interested in learning more, I suggest watching this documentary! ...

Critical Response

In Gerard Jones's essay, Violent Media is Good for Kids , he makes a claim that justifies the benefits of violent media in children's lives. Jones clearly agrees that violent media (movies, comic books, etc.) is helpful to children. He claims that these stories help children cope with their early stages of life. In the second paragraph, Jones states that comics "  were good for me because they were juvenile. And violent." He, later on, goes to state that the Marvel character the incredible hulk helped him because  "s uddenly I had a fantasy self to carry my stifled rage and buried desire for power." He goes on to say that this fantasy him helped carry him to other "senstive geeks chasing their own inner brutes." The language he used calling others brutes and explaining how this fantasy character him helped him carry his stifled rage and desire for power, does nothing but contradict his very own argument. There is nothing good about a young man wi...

Blog 8

                                               Diet and the Environment “Fish are friends, not food”, everyone knows this famous line from the classic movie Finding Nemo. So if fish are friends and not food what makes farm animals any different. Farm animals don’t deserve to be housed in cages to later on be slaughtered, but aside from the obvious immoral aspect of it all, the food we are consuming is affecting our environment. All the burgers, steaks, and bacon we are eating is slowing destroying our planet, it only takes 2,500 gallons of water to produce one pound of beef. One pound of beef only gets you a quarter pounder at Mcdonalds, but yet it takes 2,500 gallons of water to produce that one meal.  Imagine what we could do with 2,500 gallons of water if that one pound of beef it took to produce your big mac wasn’t produced or consumed. We could supply fli...