Skip to main content

Stand By Me

With everything going on in the world it may look like change isn't attainable. However, with the power of unity and companionship, change seems a lot closer to reach. Playing for Change produced a music video showcasing just that. It shows that unity and standing together can really make a powerful impact. In the video "Song Around The World", the clips of musicians from around the world are weaved together to transform the iconic song "Stand By Me". The layering of the different musical styles changes the sound into a more wholesome and full one. The images that impacted me the most were when the video shifts from outside of the US to other countries. I believe that this was very effective because in order to show the producers argument, incorporating these different places and artists in the video plays into the argument that it's better together. These images show that even though there's still a lot of violence in the world, people can still come together and make something great.

Though it's not obvious, this music video conveys an argument. It has a thesis, evidence, a not-so-clear refutation and a conclusion. The video's thesis is that coming together can create a great impact. The evidence is shown through the transformation of the song by adding different elements to make it more powerful as a musical piece. The video argues against violence by showing that diversity can also bring out unity versus violence and anarchy. To conclude, the video ends with different clips of musicians playing passionately. This makes this argument stronger by showing that if people actually stand by each other, you can achieve amazing things.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Us-TVg40ExM

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

College is a waste of time

In Dale Stephens' essay " College Is A Waste of Time ", he brings about an important argument: Is going to college worth it? There are those who think that college is a waste of time and the others who believe that college is mandatory for a good future. However, in order to properly voice out those opinions, there is a certain structure to follow in order to ensure an effective argument. This particular structure is referred to as the Four Pillars of Argument. The first pillar would be a thesis which includes the main point that you're trying to prove. Next would be the evidence. The evidence is what makes your thesis statement stronger and would help your audience see your side clearer. Third would be a refutation. A refutation addresses the other side of the argument in order to discredit the other side making your side stronger. Lastly, to close up the argument you use a concluding statement in order to tie in your point and refocus your argument. We can use S

Blog post 6

The topic that I chose to argue about is the relationship between diet and it's effect on our environment. My research question was how does an omnivorous diet affect the environment? The conclusion that I have come to is that the omnivorous diet has negative effects on the environment. Because of the increased demand for animal products, factory farming has become more prominent. With the use of family farming increasing, greenhouse gases and other harmful factors now affect the environment. I chose this topic specifically because I am vegan myself. This means that I don't consume any animal products. I don't eat meat or anything that came from an animal. This includes eggs, milk, and honey. There are people who think that veganism is only about animal rights, however, despite what your opinions may be on animal rights the effect that eating meat has on the environment is not sustainable. If you're interested in learning more, I suggest watching this documentary!

Workshop 1 draft

The author appealed to his audience by using a combination of ethos, pathos, and logos. The author uses credible sources as evidence to show that college is becoming more and more expensive. He helps the audience picture what the world would be like if we learned from hands-on experience forcing us to think for ourselves rather than to repeat our teachers. He also deduces that those who actually crave knowledge would be able to do more learning in the real world rather than in a classroom setting wasting time.